![]() |
Precious Minerals. Image generated by a.i |
In some cases, a country's colonial history gives undue
advantage to certain companies. France is a typical example of a colonial power
that maintains a predatory relationship with its former colonies. Currently,
Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, all former French colonies, are fighting to
correct unfair economic alliances with the European nation. The case of Nigeria
is a nation blinded by oil revenues. Before the discovery of oil, Nigeria's
economy was largely agro-based, relying on cash crops for revenue. The nation
also depended on solid minerals for extra income. Following the discovery of
oil, the Nigerian authorities failed to recognize that significant revenue can
come from a combination of numerous smaller sources rather than a single giant
source. The metallic mineral industry highlights the Nigerian government's
contempt for non-oil industries. The authorities have failed to demonstrate a
sincere willingness to reform the solid minerals industry for maximum benefit.
One of the negative outcomes is the invasion of the industry by illegal miners,
many of whom are foreigners who make large haulages daily.
The issue is complicated by the Exclusive Legislative List,
under which earth resources fall in Nigerian law. This ensures that the
prerogative to regulate activities in the industry remains in the hands of the
Federal Government in Abuja. However, since the federal authorities are more
concerned about oil revenues, the sector suffers. Despite the creation of an
agency like NEITI (Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative),
solid minerals-producing states still suffer from a lack of funds that would be
expected given the scale of mining activities in the states.
In December 2022, the Federal Government announced it had
given N625 billion as derivation funds to the nine oil-producing states in
Nigeria. This amounts to an average of approximately N70 billion per state per
year. On the other hand, only Nasarawa State is fortunate enough to receive
around N1 billion per month. In September 2024, Governor Caleb Mutfwang of
Plateau State complained that the state only receives about N500 million as
annual derivation revenue despite the billions generated from mining activities
in the state.
Solid minerals-producing states are embittered by the unfair
circumstances in which they find themselves. Some have developed mining
policies that take advantage of loopholes in the Nigerian Mining Laws. The aim
is to ensure they don't lose everything. These policies allow them to charge
companies certain fees for registration, inspection, haulages, etc. When
setting the charges, however, they are cautious to ensure that local companies
are not discouraged. Total charges per annum in most states may not exceed
N700,000 per annum, which is the same amount foreign companies pay. Upon
hearing this, an alarmed foreign investor exclaimed, "That's just about
three hundred pounds! Don't you value your minerals?" Thus, about £300 is
what a Chinese company pays to a solid mineral-producing state to operate for
one year, while earning hundreds of millions of pounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment