NIPPS, Kuru |
Prior to 19th
November, the kilometer-long stretch of road, from Vom Junction to the National
Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, near Jos, Plateau
State, became the focus of the men of the Federal Road Maintenance Agency
(FERMA). FERMA men went along the road, locating and healing its sores. It was
how I came to know that a parsonage was visiting NIPSS. The only such persons
are usually one of two most powerful men in the country: the President of
Nigeria or his sidekick. For a very long time now, it has always been the
later, and so it was on the 19th November.
NIPSS was founded in 1979
to, among other things, help in designing policies that would help in
mitigating some of the challenges of the nation and, even, the West African sub-region.
Over time, a question has
developed in the minds of Nigerians. It is the question of whether or not the
institute is effectively performing the role behind its creation. The question
comes partly from the reality that a lot of public institutions in Nigeria,
after years running, often become meager relics of their glowing pasts. Secondly,
if people think that NIPPS is not fully living up to the logic behind its
creation, it is partly due to the long absence of the President from the event;
he has always been represented by the Vice President, unlike the situation in
the first decade of NIPSS’s life. This is seen by many as a dent in the glamour
of the institution. It is felt that if NIPSS has such a crucial role to play in
the life of the nation, it should be the reason why the institute should be
foremost in the schedule of the President.
So, I went to NIPSS with
the hypothesis that, “NIPSS is not living up to the objective of its birth.” My
host was the spokesperson of NIPSS, Mrs. Sekyen Dogari. Mrs. Dogari explained
that NIPSS has not derailed, and it is fully living up to its mandate. Furthermore,
she said, there was nothing wrong with the absence of the President, as long as
he was represented by his deputy. She explained that it is necessary for people
to understand that NIPSS is, after all, under the supervision of the office of
the Vice President.
Regarding the criteria for
choosing participants, which has also come under strong suspicion of abuse,
Dogari explained that even though NIPSS is not responsible for choosing
participants for the training, she believes the process has never been abused.
Her conviction stems from the water-tight screening process that likely
participants undergo, prior to participation. Participants for the ten months’
course are rationed to public ministries, parastatals,
and the private sector, and, since participants at NIPSS should not exceed a
certain number within a year, the opportunity is usually rotated within its
catchments to ensure their men and women are given a fair chance of
participation. These participants must be of levels not lover than Directors,
should have had a number of publications in reputable journals and should be at
least forty years of age, among other hurdles. These names are sent to the
office of the VP, which screens them to ensure they meet the participation criteria.
Where a nominee is deemed unqualified, he is rejected and the agency involved
is requested to forward another name.
I asked Dogari if the
impact of NIPSS is been felt in Nigeria. I was astonished to find out that
NIPSS has influenced the decisions of the Federal Government of Nigeria, continuously,
ever since its establishment. Some of
the policy proposals from NIPSS’s participants are awaiting passage in the
National Assembly, while others have long been passed into laws and have become
operational. Some of these policy suggestions that have affected the Nigerian
state include: the defunct Directorate for Food, Roads and Rural
Infrastructures (DFRRI), the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), the
Ministry for Women Affairs, and, most recently, the Niger Delta Amnesty program,
among others.
If there are challenges at
NIPSS, Dogari said, it is largely that of funding. To take care of this, the office of the Vice
President has suggested that NIPSS be creative. It is the reason the institute
now has NIPSS Consult. NIPSS Consult, created in 2007, undertakes paid consultancy
and short-term training on a spectrum of areas. Through this, it raises funds
to prop up regular funding from Abuja.
Recently, people within and
around NIPSS’s niche believe that it is high time the office of the Vice
President looked into the age limit of course participants: the high age limit
ensures that participants are mostly civil servants, at the sunset of their
careers and barely last more than two years in the service after graduation
from NIPSS. The implication is that the knowledge gained is rolled into
retirement, making it a near waste.